Asch & Variables for Conformity
Variables affecting conformity include group size, unanimity and task difficulty as investigated by Asch.
Asch 1951: A classic study of conformity
Asch wanted to investigate whether people would conform to the majority in situations where an answer was obvious
Procedure
- Participants were tested in groups of 6 to 8
- Each group was presented with a standard line and three comparison lines
- Participants had to say aloud which comparison line matched the standard line in length
- In each group there was only one genuine (naive) participant the remaining were confederates
- The genuine participant was seated second to last and did not know the other participants were fake participants
- The fake confederate participants all gave the same incorrect answer
- Confederates were told to give the incorrect answer on 12 out of 18 trails
Findings
- On average, the genuine participants agreed with the confederates' incorrect answers 36.8% of the time:
- Genuine participants conformed a third of the time
- 75% of the sample conformed to the majority on at least one trial
- 25% of participants never gave a wrong answer, which shows there were individual differences
Evaluation
Artificial situation and task
- One limitation of Asch's reach is that it is artificial in both task and situation
- Participants may have gone along with what was expected as they knew they were in a research study (Demand Characteristics)
- The task was trivial and did not impact the participants in their 'real life', which means there was no reason not to conform
- Findings do not generalise to real-world situations, especially where there could be important consequences to conformity
Limited application
- Another limitation, Asch's participants were all men from the USA
- Other research has suggested that women may be more conformist due to their concern with social relationships
- The USA is an individualist culture (where people are concerned with themselves as the individual more so than in collectivist cultures where they are concerned with their social groups)
- Findings tell us little about how women or those from other cultures may confirm
Research support
- One strength of Asch's research is it has been supported by other studies
- Lucas et al (2006) asked participants to solve easy and hard maths problems and found participants conformed to the wrong answer more often when the problems were hard
- This supports Asch's claim that task difficulty is one variable that effects conformity
- However, Lucas et al (2006) also found that conformity is more complex than suggested by Asch
- They found individual-level factors can influence conformity and those who were confident in their maths skills were less likely to conform
- Asch did not research the roles of individual factors
Ethical issues
- The genuine (naive) participants were deceived as they thought the confederates were also participants
- However, it can be argued that this ethical cost does not outweigh the findings of the research
Exam Tip
On a 16-mark question, you will be expected to describe Asch's study before evaluating it.
Keep this clear and concise to allow for the development of the evaluation.