In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:
- The poem in a nutshell
- A “translation” of the poem, section-by-section
- A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Shelley’s intention and message
Ozymandias in a nutshell
Ozymandias was written by the Romantic poet Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1817. It explores the idea that all power is temporary, no matter how powerful or tyrannical the ruler, and that ultimately nature is more powerful than any human power.
Ozymandias breakdown
Lines 1-2
“I met a traveller from an antique land,
Who said -”
Translation
- The poem begins in the first person, but then instantly passes any responsibility for the opinions within the poem on to a stranger
- The narrator meets an unnamed traveller, and the poem is then recounted from the stranger’s perspective
Shelley’s intention
- Shelley was anti-monarchy and felt that the king at the time of writing, King George III, had outstayed his welcome
- Shelley probably wanted to distance himself from the political messages of the poem, so he opened his poem with the detached narrative of a traveller
- Shelley also used Ozymandias as an allegory for King George III:
- The detached narrator meant that Shelley was free to comment on the monarchy as he wished, because the views were being presented as the views of someone else
Lines 2-5
“-Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert…Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,”
Translation
- The traveller then tells of a ruined statue standing in the middle of the desert
- The statue is of a king, Ramesses II, also known as Ozymandias, who ruled over a once-great Egyptian civilisation
- Only the legs and the enormous face (the “visage”) remain
- The traveller only describes the mouth, with a “frown”, “wrinkled lip” and “sneer of cold command”
Shelley’s intention
- Shelley is commenting that all that remains of this great and powerful ruler are legs and a “shattered” visage, which creates a sense of irony:
- This is ironic because Ozymandias’s power and pride were based on his image of being a great and powerful ruler, and yet now all that remains are broken parts of a statue
- The poem portrays a king who believed strongly in his own power and superiority, and who tried to immortalise his power through his statue
- The “frown”, “wrinkled lip” and “sneer” of cold command suggest the cruelty and heartlessness of the ruler, who was arrogant and had nothing but contempt for his subjects:
- This is reflective of Shelley’s own anti-military and anti-monarchy stance
- Yet this statue has now been destroyed by time, and the king largely forgotten
Lines 6-8
“Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;”
Translation
- The reader then learns of the sculptor, who “well those passions read”, meaning that he could see beneath Ozymandias’s cold, commanding exterior to his passionate rage to “stamp” himself on the world
- When the poet refers to “The hand that mocked them”, he is implying that the sculptor knew Ozymandias’s true and ultimately futile nature
- The sculptor created the statue in a way that portrayed the cruelty of the king
Shelley’s intention
- The poem presents negative views about power used to impose individual will
- It also comments on the arrogance and pride that can come from the type of tyrannical power in which the ruler wishes only to be known for his perceived greatness
Lines 9-11
“And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Translation
- There is an inscription on the base of the statue, with the arrogant claim that he is “King of Kings”
- The inscription invites everyone, especially his “Mighty” enemies, to look at what he has achieved as a ruler, and to know that he believes that he is all powerful and cannot be defeated
Shelley’s intention
- The irony here is that the statue is falling apart and decaying, so that only the ruins remain
- The poet is showing how power deteriorates and does not last forever:
- Even great empires which seem to be eternal can fade to nothingness
Lines 12-14
“Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”
Translation
- The ruins of the enormous statue lie alone in an endless, featureless desert
Shelley’s intention
- The power of the natural world is also evident in this poem
- Sand and the desert are used as a metaphor for the passing of time:
They also suggest the impermanence of human constructions against the ultimate power of nature