Love’s Dog (Edexcel GCSE English Literature)

Revision Note

Sam Evans

Author

Sam Evans

Love’s Dog

Each GCSE poetry anthology contains 15 poems, and in your exam question you will be given one poem – printed in full – and asked to compare this printed poem to another. The exam is closed-book, which means you will not have access to the second poem. This does not mean you need to remember every line from memory, but you do need to understand and remember key aspects of the poem. Understanding four things will enable you to produce a top-grade response:

  • The meaning of the poem
  • The ideas and messages of the poet 
  • How the poet conveys these ideas through their methods
  • How these ideas compare and contrast with the ideas of other poets in the anthology

Below is a guide to Jen Hadfield’s poem 'Love’s Dog', from the Relationships anthology. It includes:

  • Overview: a breakdown of the poem, including its possible meanings and interpretations
  • Writer’s methods: an exploration of the poet’s techniques and methods
  • Context: an exploration of the context of the poem, relevant to its themes
  • What to compare it to: ideas about which poems to compare it to in the exam

Exam Tip

The exam question asks you to compare the way relationships are presented in two anthology poems. 'Love’s Dog', as part of the Relationships anthology, explores themes related to romantic relationships and desire. It is therefore as important that you learn how 'Love’s Dog' compares and contrasts with the way other poems in the anthology present such ideas, rather than understanding the poem in isolation. See the section below on “What to compare it to” for detailed comparisons of 'Love’s Dog' and other poems in the anthology.

Overview

In order to answer an essay question on any poem it is vital that you understand what it is about. This section includes:

  • The poem in a nutshell
  • A “translation” of the poem, section-by-section
  • A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Jen Hadfield’s intention and message

'Love’s Dog' in a nutshell

'Love’s Dog', written by British poet Jen Hadfield, is a debate on the advantages and disadvantages of love. The poem offers a balanced yet unconventional evaluation that highlights complexities in romantic relationships. 

'Love’s Dog' breakdown

Lines 1–2

“What I love about love is its diagnosis

What I hate about love is its prognosis”

Translation

  • The poem begins with the speaker’s opposing feelings about love
  • The lines use a metaphor that relates to illness: 
    • The “diagnosis” or symptoms (implying physical responses) of being in love are good but the outcome (the “prognosis”) is bad 

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield mirrors lines about love and hate to show close connections
  • The poet suggests the complex nature of romantic relationships brings mixed feelings

Lines 3–4

“What I hate about love is its me me me 

What I love about love is its Eat-me/Drink-me”

Translation

  • These lines continue a list of opposing statements about love
  • The speaker says love is “me me me”, perhaps implying it can make you self-absorbed
  • This is contrasted with a reference to a fantasy story, Alice in Wonderland, perhaps to imply its mysterious and magical nature:
    • The phrase “Eat-me/Drink-me” refers to labelled instructions on a cake and a bottle that change Alice’s size and lead her to an imaginary world

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield continues a list of contrasting statements that assess different aspects of love
  • In these lines, she alludes to the idea of transformation

Lines 5–6

“What I love about love is its petting zoo

What I love about love is its zookeeper - you”

Translation

  • Here, the speaker relates love to control and physical care
  • The couplets list two things the speaker loves as they address a listener

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield, perhaps, highlights ideas about care-giving in relationships
  • The direct address, accentuated by a dash, suggest a partner who controls and supervises, as well as offers care

Line 7–8

“What I love about love is its truth serum

What I hate about love is its shrinking potion” 

Translation

  • The speaker again refers to the way love can alter someone
  • These lines suggest love can force truth and make you feel small 

Hadfield's intention

  • The speaker seems grateful for the honesty of intimate relationships:
  • On the other hand, the poem implies this can be humbling:
    • Perhaps this suggests uncomfortable truths that must be faced 

Lines 9–10

“What I love about love is its doubloons

What I love about love is its bird-bones”

Translation

  • Here, the lines both describe what the speaker loves about love again
  • The first line conveys love as precious and valuable:
    • The word “doubloons” refers to old coins, and connotes to pirates and treasure
  • This is then contrasted with a starker image of small, bare bones

Hadfield's intention

  • The strange imagery presents love’s dichotomies
  • The poet uses incongruous images to symbolise two good things about love:
    • The imagery connotes to adventure and wealth
    • The image of “bird-bones” may connote to something that is fragile 

Lines 11–12

“What I hate about love is its boil-wash

What I love about love is its spin-cycle”

Translation

  • These lines refer to a washing machine, which presents love in an unconventional way
  • The speaker hates the “boil-wash”, connoting to intense heat that purifies
  • The speaker says they love the “spin-cycle”, connoting to dizziness

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield uses mundane imagery to express intense emotions:
    • The imagery alludes to ideas of painful purging (a love that purifies)
  • In contrast, love can bring excitement, maybe confusion

Lines 13–14

“What I loathe about love is its burnt toast and bonemeal

What I hate about love is its bent cigarette”

Translation

  • The speaker returns to describing two things they hate (“loathe”) about love
  • The imagery connotes to damaged things: “burnt toast” and a “bent cigarette”
  • The speaker also mentions “bonemeal” (a fertiliser made of ground animal bone)

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield uses alliteration to draw attention to love’s ability to ruin or break 
  • Darker images illustrate the speaker’s acknowledgment of painful emotions 

Lines 15–16

“What I love about love is its pirate

What I hate about love is its sick parrot”

Translation

  • These lines end the poem with opposing statements about love
  • The imagery relates back to adventure with the word “pirate” and “parrot”:
    • Parrots are associated with legendary stories about pirates
  • However, the speaker ends saying they hate the fact love is “sick”

Hadfield's intention

  • Hadfield’s evaluation of love ends with allusions to dangerous adventures that can physically weaken
  • The lines highlight the risk and excitement of romantic relationships

Exam Tip

The exam question asks you to compare the ways poets present ideas about relationships in the poem given to you on the exam paper and one other from the Relationships anthology. For the best answer, you will need to focus on the way themes are presented across two poems. 

Perhaps you could begin your answer with a clear argument that clarifies how the poems explore relationships. This is better than providing a list of as many techniques as you can find or remember, as it demonstrates that you have understood themes in the poem and the poets’ intentions. For example, “Hadfield subverts ideas about traditional, romanticised relationships. Similar themes can be found in…”

Writer’s methods

Although this section is organised into three separate sections – form, structure and language – it is always best to move from what the poet is presenting (the techniques they use; the overall form of the poem; what comes at the beginning, middle and end of a poem) to how and why they have made the choices they have. 

Focusing on the poet’s overarching ideas, rather than individual poetic techniques, will gain you far more marks. Crucially, in the below sections, all analysis is arranged by theme, and includes Hadfield’s intentions behind her choices in terms of:

  • Form
  • Structure
  • Language

Exam Tip

Examiners specifically state that they are not looking for as many “quotes” or techniques as you can find in the poem(s). In fact, it is better to understand the way themes have been conveyed, and then use language and structural techniques to support your argument. 

Identifying sophisticated techniques will not gain you any more marks, especially if these techniques are only ‘spotted’ and the poet’s intentions for this language are not explained. Instead, focus your analysis on the reasons why the poet is presenting their ideas in the way that they do: what is their message? What ideas are they presenting, or challenging?

Form

The form of 'Love’s Dog' defies traditional presentations of love to imply its realistic reflection on romantic relationships. Jen Hadfield offers a balanced assessment of the qualities, and impact, of love.

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

Romantic   

relationships

The poem is a first-person reflection that addresses a listener only once 

The narrator focuses on their feelings about love rather than speaking intimately to a loved one: 

  • This suggests detachment 

Repetition of the speaker’s thoughts suggest introspection:

  • Oppositional statements convey a balanced view  

Hadfield offers a less emotional speaker who presents an evaluation of love

Simple repetition of statements provide conclusions:

  • But the repetition of contrasting emotions conveys a conflicted voice

The poem is straightforward, yet it  expresses ideas about powerful emotions

The balanced form of Hadfield’s poem implies logic, but she juxtaposes this with repetitive ideas about oppositional emotions to show its influence

Structure

The poem’s structure conveys Hadfield’s ideas about the close connections between love and hate in romantic relationships. 

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

Complex love 

The poem makes use of anaphora to show the complexities of love 

By repeating “What I love” and “What I hate” Hadfield is able to convey love’s contrasting qualities

The list is not regular:

  • Some couplets present two things the speaker hates or loves

Mixing up lines presents a conflicted speaker:

  • For example, the word “hate” and “loathe” appear in the same couplet

A lack of punctuation deviates from traditional structures

Hadfield’s poem defies typical examples of romantic poetry as it provides no clear voice

Half-rhymes like “diagnosis” and “prognosis” begin the poem:

  • These break down by the end with unrhymed  couplets, such as in “bonemeal” and “cigarette”

The poem’s unconventional rhyme scheme contributes to an unstable speaker 

Jen Hadfield’s poem is an abstract reflection that presents love as conflicting and inconsistent

 

Language

The poem 'Love’s Dog' can be considered post-modern in its employment of metaphorical imagery that undermines traditional romantic symbolism. Its title suggests the poem explores love that can enslave or disenfranchise.

Theme

Evidence

Poet’s intention

Intense love 

A semantic field of illness connotes to love’s “symptoms”:

  • This is stressed with imagery alluding to alteration, such as “shrinking potion”

The poem’s imagery often connotes to love’s powerful physical impact

The poem implies love is caring and comforting:  

  • Relating it to a “petting zoo” connotes to childhood 
  • However, the sudden direct address in “its zookeeper - you” implies supervision or control 

Hadfield’s poem shows how the advantages of love are connected closely to the disadvantages:

  • She suggests the good things may also be bad

Imagery that alludes to love’s purity is conveyed with “boil-wash” and “truth serum”:

  • This is juxtaposed with darker images such as “burnt toast” and “bent cigarettes”

Hadfield shows love’s ability to expose faults or weaknesses:

  • Perhaps Hadfield also implies this can be damaging or humbling 

Hadfield makes allusions to adventure stories:

  • Words like “pirate” and “doubloons” work alongside “potion” and “Eat me/Drink me”

Hadfield implies love is exciting and imaginative, as well as transformative

Bizarre imagery draws attention to each metaphor so that Hadfield can emphasise the intense nature of love in a pragmatic way

Exam Tip

The best answers comment on the way elements of language, form or structure contribute or support an argument on the presentation of the theme in the question. This means you should aim to deliver an integrated comparison of the themes and ideas in this and the other poem you choose for comparison. Focus on the relevance of the methods used by the poet(s). It is better to structure your answer around an exploration of the ideas in the poems. Stay focused on the task and choose your evidence based on the theme named in the question.

Context

Examiners repeatedly state that context should not be considered as additional factual information: in this case, it is not random biographical information about Jen Hadfield or facts unrelated to the ideas in 'Love’s Dog'. The best way to understand context is as the ideas and perspectives explored by Hadfield which relate to romantic and complex relationships. 

This section has therefore been divided into two relevant themes that Hadfield explores:

  • Romantic relationships
  • Complex love

Romantic relationships 

  • Jen Hadfield, T. S. Eliot Prize winner, was born in 1978 in Cheshire, England 
  • The poem 'Love’s Dog' is part of a collection called Nigh-No-Place, written in 2008
  • The collection consists of poems that are written as a stream of consciousness:
    • 'Love’s Dog' lacks punctuation and is introspective in nature
    • It offers a reflection on romantic relationships 
  • Hadfield’s presentation of the negative elements of love in her poem can be considered typical of literature written from a feminist perspective 
  • The speaker’s confident assertions and logical evaluation of romance convey an individualistic view:
    • The speaker even refers to the way love is “me me me”, implying self-absorption 
  • The poem challenges conventional female perspectives on love and suggests a sense of independence and autonomy:
    • This may signify an egalitarian presentation of love
    • It could be reflective of changes in political policy and social attitudes to gender after the Third-wave feminist movement of the 1990s
    • The poem does not signal any particular gender
    • In this way, the poem explores romantic relationships in a more impartial way

Complex love

  • Jen Hadfield studied English Language and Literature at Edinburgh University and went on to complete a higher-level qualification at the University of Glasgow and Strathclyde
  • Her love for Scotland has been documented:
    • 'Love’s Dog' was influenced by ‘A View of Things’, a poem by Edwin Morgan, a famous Scottish poet
    • His poem contains the line “what I hate about love is its dog” and it shows parallels between love and hate, like Hadfield’s poem
  • Her poetry often focuses on the natural world and refers to animals:
    • In 'Love’s Dog', Hadfield symbolises the comforting nature of love with reference to a “petting zoo”
    • The poem adds “zookeeper - you” which may imply guardianship or control 
  • The emergence of post-modernism saw a move away from conventions and attitudes found in classical literature
  • Poems experimented with language and structure, especially by using cynical or nonchalant speakers:
    • The speaker in 'Love’s Dog' is typically jaded 
    • It is unusual to have the word “hate” mentioned in romantic poetry, especially as many times as it is in this poem
  • However, this helps present an honest, less idealised perspective on romance 
  • Critical attitudes expressed in postmodern poetry can be considered a response to social and economic pressures of the time:
    • The poem 'Love’s Dog' was written during a period of recession, a consequence of a financial crash (or crisis) in 2007
  • Postmodern poetry depicts the realities of life by drawing on common objects to express deep emotions and frustrations in everyday life:
    • Hadfield alludes to a washing machine to connote to love’s powerful impact 
  • This technique allows Hadfield, and other post-modern artists, to convey strong emotions in a casual, unemotional manner 
  • It also allows romantic poetry to present its ideas ambiguously and allow for various interpretations that are not clichéd

Exam Tip

Remember, you will be expected to demonstrate your understanding of factors in the author’s life that may have influenced the way they have presented their ideas on relationships. 

Context should be connected to the theme named in the task, and can cover aspects of genre (related to poetry), social, literary and historical context, as well as the author’s own personal influences. However, writing a whole paragraph about John Cooper Clarke is not an integrated approach, and will not achieve high marks. Instead, use contextual comments to support your ideas.

What to compare it to

The essay you are required to write in your exam is a comparison of the ideas and themes explored in two of your anthology poems. It is therefore essential that you revise the poems together, in pairs, to understand how each poet presents ideas about relationships, in comparison to other poets in the anthology. Given that ‘Love’s Dog’ explores the ideas of romantic relationships and complex love, the following comparisons are the most appropriate:

  • 'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'
  • 'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'
  • 'Love’s Dog' and 'Valentine'

For each pair of poems, you will find:

  • The comparison in a nutshell
  • Similarities between the ideas presented in each poem
  • Differences between the ideas presented in each poem
  • Evidence and analysis of these similarities and differences

Exam Tip

For the best responses, examiners are looking for perceptive comments about the way themes are presented. Your analysis should cover the way these ideas are conveyed by the poets’ choices regarding language, form and structure. It is therefore important that you have a thorough knowledge of key ideas (such as the way poems end) rather than just memorising a series of quotations. 

It is also essential that you not only write about the named poem, but compare it to one other in the anthology. Only writing about the poem given on the paper will severely limit your marks.

'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'

Comparison in a nutshell:

Both Jen Hadfield’s 'Love’s Dog' and Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s ‘How do I love Thee? (Sonnet 43)’ present speakers with strong voices who offer arguments on love to an implied listener. However, Hadfield conveys this in a post-modern poem while Barrett Browning uses a traditional sonnet

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both speakers address a romantic partner to convey assured thoughts on love

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog'

'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'

Jen Hadfield’s poem is offered from a personal, first-person perspective:

  • The poem is almost exclusively a monologue 
  • It addresses a listener, though: “its zookeeper - you”

Barrett Browning’s poem also depicts a speaker’s thoughts directed to a listener:

  • The repetitive “I love thee” focuses predominantly on the speaker’s thoughts about love

Hadfield offers an assertive argument using anaphora, listing “What I love” followed by “What I hate”

Barrett Browning’s speaker also builds a strong argument to prove their love:

  • Anaphora in many lines builds a list  
  • A question begins the poem, “How do I love thee?”
  • This is followed with the emphatic reply, “Let me count the ways.”

Hadfield’s speaker conveys certainty with a strong voice: 

  • The straightforward statements in each line convey logical thought  

Similarly, Barrett Browning presents an assured speaker:

  • In this poem, hyperbole conveys the speaker’s conviction

The poets use strong speakers who are able to clearly express their thoughts on a romantic relationship, and in this way they both deviate from traditional Romantic poetry

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both speakers describe love as powerfully impactful 

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog' 

'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'

Hadfield conveys the intensity of love with imagery: 

  • The speaker says love is a “prognosis” and a “diagnosis”, implying its physical effects

Barrett Browning presents love as similarly consuming, using hyperbolic language:

  • The speaker loves with “the depth and breadth and height/My soul can reach”

Hadfield’s poem alludes to the positive and negative elements of love:

  • Opposing forces are implied in the couplet referring to “truth serum” and “shrinking potion”

Similarly, Barrett Browning’s list conveys love with contrasting imagery, placing the oxymoronic “Smiles” next to “tears”

Hadfield describes a love that is painful and disorientating: 

  • The speaker describes a “boil-wash” and “spin-cycle”

Barrett Browning also alludes to darker themes: 

  • The speaker says, “I shall but love thee better after death.”

The poets both present love as intense and highlight its overwhelming effect

 

Differences:

Topic sentence

While Hadfield undermines traditional romantic poetry, Barrett Browning’s conventional sonnet elevates it

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog' 

'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'

Hadfield’s poem breaks conventions with its lack of punctuation (other than a dash):

  • This creates a less emotional speaker 

In contrast, Barrett Browning uses a Petrarchan sonnet:

  • The traditional rhythm creates a passionate speaker

Hadfield‘s speaker uses simple language to convey a down-to-earth tone

In contrast, Barrett Browning elevates love with archaic language and classical references, such as “thee” and “as men strive for right”

Hadfield’s postmodern poem uses everyday items as symbols of love:

  • The poem uses metaphorical imagery such as an “burnt toast” and “bent cigarette” 

Keeping with tradition, ‘Sonnet 43’ uses religious imagery to imply pure love:

  • The speaker compares their love to “childhood’s faith”
  • It is stronger than love for “lost saints”

Hadfield subverts conventional romantic ideas to present a realistic evaluation of love, while Barrett Browning’s Victorian poem alludes to Romantic traditions to present all-encompassing love

Exam Tip

It is a good idea to outline your argument in your introduction, providing a clear overview of the overarching themes within both poems. You can then use the theme to move between both poems to illustrate and support your arguments. 

However, this does not mean that you cannot focus on one poem first, and then the other, linking ideas back to the main poem. You should choose whichever structure suits you best, as long as comparison is embedded and ideas for both texts are well-developed.

'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'  

Comparison in a nutshell:

This is an effective comparative choice to explore the presentation of romantic love in modern poems. While the poems both convey love as powerful, Hadfield’s poem is a balanced abstract reflection, whereas Cooper Clarke’s direct address is an intensive declaration of love. 

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both poems can be considered postmodern interpretations of romantic relationships 

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog' 

'i wanna be yours'

Hadfield offers a realistic assessment of love:

  • The repetitive “What I” emphatically contrasts what the speaker loves and hates about love

Cooper Clarke uses colloquial language to similarly present a realistic portrayal of love, for example “you call the shots” and “wanna”

In 'Love’s Dog' simple rhymes like “me” and “me” create an irreverent tone:

  • This is also seen in half-rhymes like “serum” and “potion”

Cooper Clarke creates a casual voice with non-standard grammar and internal rhyme, for example “coffee hot” and “coffee pot”

Both poets undermine traditional presentations of romantic relationships with realist poems that convey authentic reflections on love

Topic sentence

Both poems juxtapose the powerful impact of love with simple imagery 

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog' 

'i wanna be yours'

Hadfield uses an unconventional metaphor to describe love’s power:

  • The speaker says love is a “diagnosis” and that they hate its “prognosis”
  • Love is a “sick parrot”

Similarly, Cooper Clarke’s symbolism is drawn from everyday life to draw attention to its strength:

  • For example, the speaker refers to “setting lotion” and an ”electric heater” 

Hadfield highlights imagery with alliteration: 

  • Love is described unconventionally in phrases such as “bird-bones”, “burnt toast and bonemeal” and “bent cigarette”

Cooper Clarke uses auditory devices to defy convention:

  • The passion in the relationship is conveyed with alliterative lines like “deep deep deep deep de deep”

'Love’s Dog' refers to mundane things that connote to strong emotions:

  • Love is compared to a “boil-wash” and a “spin cycle” to connote to chaotic emotions

Cooper Clarke similarly describes love’s power: 

  • The speaker wants to breathe in their partner’s “dust” like a “vacuum cleaner”

Both poets portray love as physically impactful and potentially dangerous 

Differences:

Topic sentence

Hadfield’s poem is a balanced and conceptual reflection but Cooper Clarke’s lyrical poem conveys a passionate speaker who surrenders entirely to love

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog'

'i wanna be yours'

Hadfield’s poem consists of regular rhyming couplets that represent a balanced voice: 

  • Hadfield mirrors lines, such as “What I love” and “What I hate”

Cooper Clarke’s poem, in contrast, is a persistent list using anaphora:

  • This creates a persuasive tone that hints at obsession with the repetitive “let me be your”

Hadfield’s speaker presents love as oppositional

The speaker in 'i wanna be yours' is submissive, offering a love that is entire

Hadfield uses magical allusions to acknowledge love’s ability to delude:

  • Love is a “shrinking potion”
  • The poet refers to the magical story of Alice in Wonderland
  • Love is related to treasure (“doubloons”) and pirates to connote adventure

In contrast, Cooper Clarke’s speaker appears overwhelmed by love:

  • The speaker says “take me with you anywhere/i don’t care”

Hadfield’s reflective evaluation of love contrasts with Cooper Clarke’s dramatic poem, which presents a fervent speaker’s impassioned submission to a romantic relationship 

 'Love’s Dog' and 'Valentine'

Comparison in a nutshell:

This is an effective comparative choice to explore the presentation of romantic love in modern poems. While the poems both juxtapose love’s intensity with pragmatism, Hadfield’s poem is a balanced, abstract reflection, while Duffy’s poem is an immediate and emotional address to a lover. 

Similarities:

Topic sentence

Both poems employ speakers who address a loved one with pragmatism

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog' 

'Valentine' 

Hadfield offers a confident and realistic assessment of love:

  • The repetitive “What I” makes the speaker’s self-assured voice the focus of the poem
  • Couplets emphatically contrast what the speaker loves and hates about love

Duffy depicts a speaker’s honest assertions on love: 

  • The speaker addresses a listener bluntly, “Take it.”
  • Anaphora emphasises the confident assessment: “Not a” and “It will” 

In 'Love’s Dog', simple rhymes like “me” and “me” create an irreverent tone:

  • This is also seen in half-rhymes like “serum” and “potion”

'Valentine' is also an unconventional romantic poem that uses half-rhyme: 

  • A casual tone is created with rhymes like “cling” and “fingers” or “kiss” and “lips” 
  • This is also evident in phrases such as “if you like” 

Both poems undermine traditional presentations of romantic relationships with frank speakers who offer balanced ideas about love

Similarities: 

Topic sentence

Both poems juxtapose the powerful impact of love using simple imagery 

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog'

'Valentine' 

Hadfield uses an unconventional metaphor to describe love’s power:

  • The speaker says love is a “diagnosis” and that they hate its “prognosis”
  • Love is a “sick parrot”

Duffy’s symbolic representation of love is a common onion:

  • However, Duffy’s comparisons show its physical impact
  • It can “blind” you with “tears”
  • Sensory language describes its “scent” that will “cling”

Hadfield uses imagery, highlighted by alliteration, to imply darker ideas: 

  • Phrases such as “bird-bones”, “burnt toast and bonemeal” and “bent cigarette” describe love negatively 

Duffy’s poem subverts traditional images of romance with cynicism:

  • The disdainful tone is created with alliteration (the “red rose” and the “cute card and kissogram”)

'Love’s Dog' refers to mundane things that connote to painful emotions:

  • Love is compared to a “boil-wash” and a “spin cycle” to connote to chaotic emotions

Duffy’s metaphor, the onion, is extended to similarly convey the risk inherent in romantic relationships:

  • It is described dramatically as  “Lethal.”
  • Duffy ends referring to a “knife”

Both poets portray love as complex and potentially dangerous 

Differences:

Topic sentence

Hadfield’s poem is a symbolic, conceptual reflection while Duffy’s poem depicts a tangible moment in a relationship

Evidence and analysis

'Love’s Dog'

'Valentine' 

Hadfield’s poem consists of regular rhyming couplets that represent a balanced voice: 

  • Hadfield mirrors lines, such as “What I love” and “What I hate”

Duffy, in contrast, uses an irregular form to convey an unstable voice:

  • Enjambment conveys delight, such as in “It promises light/like the careful undressing of love.”
  • Yet this flowing rhythm abruptly ends with sudden isolated lines

Hadfield’s poem is a consistent list, suggesting forethought and clarity 

However, Duffy creates a sense of spontaneity with one-line stanzas like “I am trying to be truthful.”

  • Deictic words (“Here”) imply the speaker hands over the gift 

Hadfield relates love to magical and fantastical ideas:

  • Love is described as a “shrinking potion”
  • The poem refers to the magical story of Alice in Wonderland
  • Love is related to treasure (“doubloons”) and pirates to connote adventure

In contrast, Duffy’s presentation of love uses simple household objects like “brown paper”, a “photo” and a “wedding ring” 

Hadfield’s reflective evaluation of love contrasts Duffy’s dramatic characterisation of a lover offering a Valentine’s Day gift 

Exam Tip

Choose whichever poem you are able to make the most in-depth comparisons with in the exam. For example, you could choose to compare the presentation of romance in 'Love’s Dog' and 'How do I love thee? (Sonnet 43)'. Or you might wish to explore the idea of complex desire in 'Love’s Dog' and 'i wanna be yours'. What is important is that you view the poems thematically, with a clear emphasis on relationships. This will give you a better framework in which to write your response in the exam.

You've read 0 of your 0 free revision notes

Get unlimited access

to absolutely everything:

  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Unlimited Revision Notes
  • Topic Questions
  • Past Papers
  • Model Answers
  • Videos (Maths and Science)

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Sam Evans

Author: Sam Evans

Sam is a graduate in English Language and Literature, specialising in journalism and the history and varieties of English. Before teaching, Sam had a career in tourism in South Africa and Europe. After training to become a teacher, Sam taught English Language and Literature and Communication and Culture in three outstanding secondary schools across England. Her teaching experience began in nursery schools, where she achieved a qualification in Early Years Foundation education. Sam went on to train in the SEN department of a secondary school, working closely with visually impaired students. From there, she went on to manage KS3 and GCSE English language and literature, as well as leading the Sixth Form curriculum. During this time, Sam trained as an examiner in AQA and iGCSE and has marked GCSE English examinations across a range of specifications. She went on to tutor Business English, English as a Second Language and international GCSE English to students around the world, as well as tutoring A level, GCSE and KS3 students for educational provisions in England. Sam freelances as a ghostwriter on novels, business articles and reports, academic resources and non-fiction books.