OCR A Level Biology

Revision Notes

6.6.6 Balancing Human Need & Conservation

Test Yourself

Balancing Human Need & Conservation

  • Humans use many resources from the Earth such as land (for settlements, industry and agriculture), water, wood and fossil fuels
  • As the human population increases and countries become more economically developed, our requirement for these natural resources also increases
  • This is having a harmful effect on many aspects of the environment, including aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, and our atmosphere and climate
  • The damage to these ecosystems is negatively impacting the species and habitats contained within them
  • This means that a conflict exists between human needs and conservation
    • Conservation is the protection and management of species and habitats (i.e. ecosystems) in a sustainable way
    • Sustainable use of ecosystems (and the resources they provide us with) means using these resources in a way that meets the needs of humans alive now, without reducing the ability of future humans to meet their own needs
    • However, not everyone agrees with conservation and sustainable practices, as this may appear to limit them in certain ways (e.g. financially) in the short-term
    • Careful management of natural resources is required to ensure humans use them sustainably but in a way that still fulfils their current needs

The change in food demand

  • After World War II there was a massive change in how food was produced
  • There was a need to produce more food, at a quicker rate
    • In other words, farmers needed to produce a higher yield

  • It was then that modern farming practices began:
    • Farms became more specialised so they grew only one crop or raised one type of livestock (monoculture)
    • There was a switch to growing cereal crops rather than vegetables
    • Fields were made bigger to accommodate large machinery by the removal of hedgerows and stone walls
    • More land was turned to arable use by draining wetland and filling in ponds
    • The use of pesticides and fertilizers increased massively

Effects of modern farming on biodiversity

  • Biodiversity looks at the range and variety of genes, species and habitats within a particular region
  • In relation to farming the biodiversity of insect, animal and plant species is often measured and studied
  • Some modern farming techniques have had a major negative impact on the level of biodiversity present in farming areas
  • Conservationists have made strong efforts to try and maintain or improve biodiversity around farmlands
    • They have rewilded areas by removing all human interference and reintroducing native species
    • Organic farming has been largely promoted and encouraged
    • Re-establishment of hedgerows
    • Planting of wildflower field margins

Improving grazing land

  • Nutritious, fast-growing grass is essential for raising healthy livestock
    • A dairy cow is capable of eating almost 20kg of dry biomass in one day

  • A mixture of ryegrass and white clover species provides the highest quality grazing pasture. These species only grow on drained, fertilised land
  • Farmers deliberately fertilise and drain the land and sow the seeds of these two plant species
  • As a result, other plant species are either outcompeted or the changes to the land mean it is no longer a suitable habitat for them - there is low species richness
  • Natural grazing land that hasn’t been interfered with has a large variety of plant species present which can support a much greater range and number of insect species and bird species
  • Wet grasslands have declined steeply in the last 100 years and are now regarded as biodiversity hotspots

Sowing of cereal crops

  • For farmland bird species the ploughing of fields and the harvesting of crops are the two points in the year when food is plentiful
    • Ploughing brings invertebrates to the surface
    • Harvesting provides spilt grain from the crops and seeds from weeds, as well as making invertebrates more accessible by removing their cover

  • Traditionally crops were sowed in the spring
    • The soil was ploughed in March
    • Grains were sown in late April
    • Harvest took place in September
    • The gap between harvesting and ploughing was significant - five or six months

  • Modern farming has switched to sowing crops in the autumn
    • The soil is ploughed in August
    • Grains are sown in September
    • Harvest takes place in July
    • The gap between harvesting and ploughing is very short - one or two weeks

  • The smaller gap between harvesting and ploughing means there is a very short period of time during the year when food is plentiful for birds however there is less time where the soil is redundant for the farmer
  • Scientists believe that this switch from spring to autumn sowing will greatly reduce the diversity of farmland birds in the future

Organic farming

  • Many people favour the produce from organic farms as the food produced is free from harmful chemicals
    • The use of pesticides and inorganic fertilizers is highly restricted on organic farms

  • The reduction in the use of these chemicals is also thought to boost biodiversity in and around organic farms
  • This is a common viewpoint however there is currently very little scientific evidence that backs these claims
  • Organic farming is, however, less productive than intensive farming, though more sustainable

The decline of the bumblebee

  • Bumblebees are essential pollinators that pollinate wildflowers and valued crops such as oilseed rape and peas
  • Almost a quarter of the European bumblebee species are threatened with extinction
  • There has been a very rapid decline in bumblebee numbers in recent years
  • Bumblebees require habitats with a large number of flowering plants to ensure a supply of pollen and nectar all year round. Examples of this are hedgerows, field margins and grasslands
  • It has been suggested that the intensive farming of crops and the use of pesticides are contributing to this decline
    • The monoculture of crops reduces plant diversity for bumblebee habitats
    • Although they are not the target species, pesticides can have a negative effect on bumblebees

  • There is still inconclusive evidence as to whether these modern farming methods are the overriding cause of the bees' falling numbers

Biodiversity vs profit

  • A high yield and profit are two factors that make farming economically viable
  • Farming practices that maintain or increase biodiversity can be expensive, labour intensive, time-intensive. They can also reduce the yield of crops and livestock
    • For example, if a farmer stops using pesticides on crops, the number of bumblebees will increase but the number of pest species that destroy crops will also increase which will reduce crop yield and profit
    • This means that the farmer will have to charge more for his produce, in what is a very competitive market

  • It is difficult to find the balance between conservation and farming due to these knock-on effects
  • The EU has several grant schemes set up to encourage farmers to use more environmentally friendly farming techniques. The money provided by the grants can offset any profit lost due to lower yields

Case study - Maasai Mara National Reserve

  • A well-known example of how the conflict between human needs and the conservation of species has been resolved through careful management can be seen in the Maasai Mara national reserve in Kenya
    • This is an area of savannah (grassland) in equatorial Africa that contains a high diversity of species

  • The Maasai people raise livestock (e.g. cattle) on the land but this can damage the ecosystem through overgrazing of livestock, leaving less grassland available for wild species, and deliberate poisoning of predators that occasionally kill the livestock (e.g. lions, which are an endangered species of conservation concern)
    • This causes a conflict with conservationists

  • Through working closely with the Maasai people and understanding their needs, conservation trusts are helping them to make money from their land in other ways or from continuing farming done in a more sustainable way. For example:
    • Employing local people to work on conservation and ecotourism projects
    • Employing local people to monitor the lions and their locations (using GPS tracking systems), which allows farmers to move their livestock away from certain areas before the lions arrive, instead of resorting to poison

  • In these ways, the needs of the Maasai people can be met, whilst also protecting the biodiversity of the savannah

Case study - the Terai Region

  • The Terai region is in southern Nepal, on the border with India
    • The region is sometimes referred to as the Terai Arc
  • The region contains grassland and forest, and a variety of plant and animal species, including the endangered Bengal tiger, Asian elephant, and the greater one-horned rhinoceros
  • The region is densely populated and its people are highly dependent on the area's natural resources
  • Agriculture can involve the clearing of forest land for grazing and crops, and land has also been cleared for housing development
  • The movement of people into areas that were once forest has brought them into conflict with wildlife, increasing the chances of animals being killed for causing damage
    • Elephants can eat and flatten crops
    • Tigers can predate livestock
  • The local people are often dependent on intact forest for resources
    • Fuel
    • Animal feed
    • Human food
    • Medicines
    • Building materials
  • Conservation charities have worked together with local people to conserve the forest
    • Local people have the right to use the forest's resources in a sustainable way
    • Community groups protect the forest against poachers
    • Wildlife corridors have been developed that allow animals to pass between nature reserves safely
    • Locals can learn forestry skills
    • The WWF have provided local people with biogas generators and solar stoves to reduce dependence on the forest for fuel
  • Local tiger populations have been showing signs of recovery

Case study - peat bogs

  • Peat bogs are areas of waterlogged land within which the process of decomposition is incomplete
    • The waterlogged plant material does not contain enough oxygen for decomposers
    • The conditions are too acidic for decomposers
  • Under these anaerobic and acidic conditions partly decomposed dead plant matter accumulates and becomes compacted under its own weight over time; this compacted, partially decomposed plant matter forms peat
  • The peat that builds up over thousands of years forms a crucial carbon store, or sink
    • The incomplete decomposition means that the carbon remains locked up inside the dead plant matter and is not released into the atmosphere by decomposers

  • Peat bogs support a unique combination of plant species that are adapted to survive in these unusual conditions, e.g.
    • Sphagnum mosses
    • Bog cotton
    • Heathers
  • The plant species in turn support many species of invertebrate, which form the basis of a community that also includes bird and amphibian species
    • Birds can nest on the ground
    • Birds of prey can hunt in wide open spaces
  • Peat bogs are under pressure as a result of human activities
    • Peat stores carbon in the same way the fossil fuels do, so it can be burned as a fuel source
    • Peat retains moisture very effectively, so it is removed from peat bogs and used by gardeners to improve soil
    • Peatland can be drained, allowing it to dry out so that farmers can use the land for growing crops
    • Trees draw water up out of the soil during transpiration, so afforestation can cause harm to peat bogs
  • Over 90 % of UK peat bogs have been lost in the last 100 years due to human exploitation
  • Peat bog conservation and restoration are essential in the fight to restore biodiversity and combat climate change
  • Many organisations are working to restore peatland
    • Filling in drainage ditches allows water to accumulate in the soil
    • Controlled grazing improves biodiversity
    • Removal of tree seedlings reduces water loss from the soil
  • The use of peat for garden compost is becoming less popular as gardeners are educated about the harm caused by peat harvesting

You've read 0 of your 0 free revision notes

Get unlimited access

to absolutely everything:

  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Unlimited Revision Notes
  • Topic Questions
  • Past Papers
  • Model Answers
  • Videos (Maths and Science)

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Phil

Author: Phil

Phil has a BSc in Biochemistry from the University of Birmingham, followed by an MBA from Manchester Business School. He has 15 years of teaching and tutoring experience, teaching Biology in schools before becoming director of a growing tuition agency. He has also examined Biology for one of the leading UK exam boards. Phil has a particular passion for empowering students to overcome their fear of numbers in a scientific context.