DP IB Physics: HL

Revision Notes

Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2014

Last exams 2024

|

9.2.2 Intensity of Interference Maxima & Minima

Test Yourself

Intensity of Interference Maxima & Minima

  • Using different sources of monochromatic light demonstrates that:
    • Increasing the wavelength increases the width of the fringes
  • The angle of diffraction of the first minima can be found using the equation:

theta equals lambda over b

  • Where:
    • θ = the angle of diffraction (radians)
    • λ = wavelength (m)
    • b = slit width (m)
  • This equation explains why red light produces wider maxima
    • It is because the longer the wavelength, λ, the larger the angle of diffraction, θ
  • It also explains the coloured fringes seen when white light is diffracted
    • It is because red light (longer λ) will diffract more than blue light (shorter λ)
    • This creates fringes which are blue nearer the centre and red further out
  • It also explains why wider slits cause the maxima to be narrower
    • It is because the wider the slit, b, the smaller the angle of diffraction, θ

9-3-2-slit-width

Slit width and angle of diffraction are inversely proportional. Increasing the slit width leads to a decrease in angle of diffraction, hence the maxima appear narrower

Single Slit Geometry

  • The diffraction pattern made by waves passing through a slit of width b can be observed on a screen placed a large distance away

oRULRXAE_9-2-2-diffraction-geometry-ib-hl

The geometry of single-slit diffraction

  • If the distance, D, between the slit and the screen is considerably larger than the slit width, D greater than greater than b:
    • The light rays can be considered as a set of plane wavefronts that are parallel to each other

9-2-2-single-slit-geometry

Determining the path difference using two parallel waves

  • For two paths, r1 and r2, travelling parallel to each other at an angle, θ, between the normal and the slit, the path difference will be:

path difference = r1 − r2b over 2 sin space theta

  • For a minima, or area of destructive interference:

The path difference must be a half-integral multiple of the wavelength

path difference = fraction numerator n lambda over denominator 2 end fraction

  • Equating these two equations for path difference:

fraction numerator n lambda over denominator 2 end fraction equals b over 2 sin space theta

n lambda equals b sin space theta

  • Where n is a non-zero integer number, n = 1, 2, 3...

  • Since the angle θ is small, the small-angle approximation may be used: sin space theta almost equal to theta

n lambda equals b theta

  • Therefore, the first minima, n = 1, occurs at:

lambda equals b theta

  • This leads to the equation for angle of diffraction of the first minima:

theta equals lambda over b

Worked example

A group of students are performing a diffraction investigation where a beam of coherent light is incident on a single slit with width, b.

The light is then incident on a screen which has been set up a distance, D, away.

9-2-2-we1-intensity-of-interference-ib-hl

A pattern of light and dark fringes is seen.

The teacher asks the students to change their set-up so that the width of the first bright maximum increases.

Suggest three changes the students could make to the set-up of their investigation which would achieve this.

Step 1: Write down the equation for the angle of diffraction

theta equals lambda over b

    • The width of the fringe is related to the size of the angle of diffraction, θ

Step 2: Use the equation to determine the factors that could increase the width of each fringe

Change 1

    • The angle of diffraction, θ, is inversely proportional to the slit width, b

theta proportional to 1 over b

    • Therefore, reducing the slit width would increase the fringe width

Change 2

    • The angle of diffraction, θ, is directly proportional to the wavelength, λ

theta proportional to lambda

    • Therefore, increasing the wavelength of the light would increase the fringe width

Change 3

    • The distance between the slit and the screen will also affect the width of the central fringe
    • A larger distance means the waves must travel further hence, will spread out more
    • Therefore, moving the screen further away would increase the fringe width

You've read 0 of your 0 free revision notes

Get unlimited access

to absolutely everything:

  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Unlimited Revision Notes
  • Topic Questions
  • Past Papers
  • Model Answers
  • Videos (Maths and Science)

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Lindsay Gilmour

Author: Lindsay Gilmour

Lindsay graduated with First Class Honours from the University of Greenwich and earned her Science Communication MSc at Imperial College London. Now with many years’ experience as a Head of Physics and Examiner for A Level and IGCSE Physics (and Biology!), her love of communicating, educating and Physics has brought her to Save My Exams where she hopes to help as many students as possible on their next steps.